Server rentals :: NFOservers.com

i have some questions about differences between 2k3 and 2k8 in the gaming environment. its difficult to find information on the net.

my background;

i have been running game servers for several years, on old boxes that were retired for one reason or another from desktop duty, so they arent the latest hardware, or software. to that effect, most of them were on winxp, and that worked flawlessly for gaming servers. i now use windows 7 for the workstations, but am moving to vds for the gaming servers.

i have no experience with either win2k3 or 2k8 except for the last few days experimenting around on a vds. i use firedaemon on all my game servers, and have for a couple years. my observations as to the differences between the two are as follows (with the caveat that this is only what i have seen on initial install, which means there may be a way to change it).

task manager on win2k8 shows the actual physical memory, where 2k3 shows that plus the paging file. therefore 2k8 is easier to see how much memory im using at any point in time.

session 0; is a pain on either system, but easier to get into on win2k8.
to get into session 0 on 2k3 i have to either open a cmd prompt in my desktop machine, or remote into session 0 from the vds using the same cmd prompt. in 2k8 i just need to click on the window telling me there are hidden command windows.

the console/game windows launched in session 0 are not scrollable in 2k8, where they are in 2k3. not a big deal, but helps with troubleshooting things. i can get around this temporarily by launching them directly.

remote desktop; win2k8 actually remembers the credentials, and logs in the next time without any further intervention. win2k3 forces me to re enter the admin/pw each time i log in, a pain if you just want to quickly look at something.

memory usage; i dont really see much difference, with each system taking almost 500mb after i install firedaemon and a couple other management programs; ie without launching a single server instance. so they both eat a lot of memory.

performance; i dont see much difference. im ping boosting both, with reasonable frame rates (depending on the game up to 500fps, thats about it; i dont see any improvement after that so havent tried to go faster).

so i guess the question is; what am i missing? everything i read says win2k3 is better for gaming, as it runs smoother, but never details what that means. i have also seen some references to less memory, but again, no details. but that i can believe because i have never seen microsoft decrease memory on a new product.

i started off using win2k8, changed to win2k3 to see if the session 0 issue was easier to deal with, and based on what i am seeing, with my limited experience, its much worse. so i plan on going back to win2k8.

unless i can get some information that convinces me otherwise. like i said, all my experience on both of these os's are from the last few days, so its fairly limited.

thanks for any input that is on point (on point means windows 2003 server vs windows 2008 or 2008r2 server in the gaming/vds environment)

mark

Both work well for game servers. Win2k3 is compatible with a rare game or two that doesn't work on Win2k8, but the other differences are pretty minor, as you've seen.

Don't worry about it. It's like riding a bike as if it were in Windows XP Classic Mode.



You can also look at the performance monitor instead of task manager. Task manager is never really accurate. Then again.. nothing ever is to the full extent.



eh, don't have much to say about that one.



I have to say it's quite a good feature.



Wrong there. If you're running Windows 7 on your home computer, it will allow you to save the credentials. You just have to do it manually. I'm running win2k3 x86 on my server.





I would have to say win2k8 takes up more memory on a base install rather than win2k3.



It depends. Both Operating Systems provide stability, but when it comes to game servers, they vary on performance.



Exactly. With win2k3, because the performance is at a strict halt in a various amount of cases, you'll actually be able to run more programs/applications/services than you would on win2k8.


Personally, with the rest of the posts aside, I've battled between every OS in every server scenario. I would highly NOT recommend win2k8 for a VDS/VPS. If you're running a I don't know.. X3460 w/ 4GB RAM, I say go for win2k8. But other than that, definitely a no go for me, just my personal opinion. I'm about performance, yet diversity, and that's why I choose win2k3. (Currently own a 3 core VDS with 9 KF servers, 1 CSS (1 more coming), 3 TF2, 1 Minecraft, and 1 TS3. WAMP Server will also be installed.) It's really nothing short of a miracle. But, with win2k3, with 9 KF servers running, my RAM usage is still under 2GB, and my CPU usage on all cores total stays below 20%.

i did all that, didnt work on win2k3, so go figure. might be 'wrong' on your system, but not on mine.

as to the other issues, thanks for the feedback. at this point im using win2k8 and it is working fine. given the tradoffs/my experience, i dont think i'll be going back.