Server rentals :: NFOservers.com

A: No, at least not yet. HLDS running under Linux performs worse (i.e., uses significantly more CPU power, gives higher pings, and makes for less stable pings) than HLDS under win32.

But wouldnt HLDS 64bit run better then 32bit? Hence linux being better?

Yes I know, its not entirely misleading but still just glancing it sounds like all your servers would be 246's

Oh okay, but the way you have it on your page is that you use 246's and higher, like your baseline is 246. I agree it wont matter too much on performance but 244's only compatable with pc2700 at the highest which doesnt make them monsters. But you have to admit the statement is a little misleading

On the front of http://rentals.nuclearfallout.net/ it says and I quote "Dual Opteron 246 (2.0ghz) or better (faster than any Xeon!)" and I went on the control panel and I see that i'm on "1.8 Opterons" which are 244's. That does make a difference, difference between ddr400, dual ...

AMXx 0.20 looks very very promising

Colocation me likey, when will you release more info on colo?

Didn't think so, just edge said the pricing will be the same as hybrid so I was thinking value and Cogent is cheap

I just hope you wont be using Cogent in Chicago, sorry pings

Well depends which mod he got with the server (admin/amx mod)and to add admins I would check the FAQ section

And no you dont need to download anything, its all on the server in config files

3) OPTIONAL: To display a "banner image" to players that download content, place a 340x56 pixel image in the file <custom content directory>/gfx/banner.gif I put a banner.gif in the gfx folder that meets the deminsions but it only shows up black on steam, does this happen to everyone else?

Has anyone got the banner to work? Mines just black

1) Make a list of all the custom files (bsp, wav, mdl, etc)
used on your server .

- list is a bad description what he's talking about is a more like a mappack

I stll dont understand this part? List? Mappack? confusing

Ive had all my members do a traceroute... and it only starts lagging about when it gets to LA but heres the one with the biggest problem (hes in arizona) 1 1 192.168.0.1 2 2 192.168.1.1 3 48 67.41.20.254 (67-41-20-254.tcsn.qwest.net) 4 48 65.100.111.29 (tcsn-agw1.inet.qwest.net) 5 50 207.108.112.202...

I live on the east coast for now and its smooth for me I get 60-70 which is fine but a member of mine who livez in arizona gets 120-130... I dont see how that happens. He has dsl so its not dial up problem. Can this be solved?

everyones getting this problem thats why im stumpted